Post by [GG] SeaDogg on Oct 20, 2006 16:41:05 GMT -5
So let me see if I get this straight?
The French army at Austerlitz was their best in the field and they won - Right?
And the British Army was the worst combination they ever had at Waterloo and they still won>? Doesnt that say somthing about the quality of those troops anyway>?
Incidently, Austerlitz and Trafalgar occurred relatively close to each other in time and Trafalgar was a great victory for the British Empire in general, the navy won it but the French suffered fatally on land because of it. The Spanish werent worth a damm to Nappy afterwards either.
LETS continue this discussion in a GG only area. Can someone do that?